• fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Slash and burn ag is so stupid…

    From Wikipedia:

    The productivity of the soil following forest removal for farming lasts only a year or two before the fields become infertile and farmers must clear new areas of forest to maintain their income. In 1995, nearly half (48%) of the deforestation in Brazil was attributed to poorer farmers clearing lots under 125 acres (0.51 km2) in size.

    They typically grow crops on the land at first, then due to poor soil management it becomes useless for crops so they put cattle on it and burn down more forest to grow more soy or whatever.

    Then again. Big picture time… We’re globally releasing enough GHGs that it’s equivalent to burning down the entire Amazon rainforest every two months.

    • rbn@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Unfortunately, it won’t be them in most cases. It will be future generations and people in poorer countries that suffer first and the hardest.

        • rbn@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          I haven’t, but I’m more than happy if the market proofs me wrong. IMO the price can’t be high enough if that’s what it takes to reduce the demand.

          • CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The demand is insatiable, and unmet. Price based demand destruction is only part what were seeing here. Whatever can be made will be sold. We can’t supply enough to meet demand so we ration by price.

            It’s not the victory you probably hope for.