• buedi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I also am super hyped after playing the open beta and server slam, but knowing Blizzard, I will hold off buying it for now. I am curiuous how their monetization evolves. One could think because this is AAA priced (or even a bit above) and has a Cosmetic shop and a paid battle pass, that future expansions should be covered by that revenue. But I fear they do not see it like that and will charge for expansions (they already said that they are working on 2) and new classes will be sold separately and once the game is “complete”, it will cost me several hundred bucks. There is so much stuff I can play, I can wait, although I must admit that what I saw in the 2 betas looked very good.

    • CheshireSnake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Thanks for reminding me about the expansions! I think they are making 2 so far? I’m guessing those will be paid (specially if they’re big/major), but still hoping I’m wrong. I didn’t play D3 but did they charge for any expansions there?

      I’m playing Last Epoch and sometimes PoE for my arpg fix, so I can wait.

      • buedi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        In D3 there is the Reaper of Souls expansion which costs around 20 bucks. I think it added the 4th Act and improved the game so much that many claim it is essential because it made the game good. And you can buy another class (the Necromancer) which costs 15 bucks. I only recently started with D3 and bought the Prime Evil Collection when it was on sale which includes D3 + Reaper of Souls + Necromancer + Diablo II Resurrected, so I have tons of stuff to discover :-) I played PoE since it went open Beta many years ago until around a year ago (around 5K hours), but it is not for me anymore. I played the Torchlight games, which were fun, tried Last Epoch (somehow did not fit to me) and (don’t laugh) give Minecraft Dungeons sometimes a spin, which can be quite fun as lighthearted as it is :-)

        There´s so much stuff out there (even in the ARPG genre), that I can wait a bit to see what is happening with Diablo IV regarding Monetization and DLC / Expansions.

        • CheshireSnake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          (don’t laugh)

          I’m not laughing. I love Terraria and played Portal Knights. Minecraft (and other iterations) didn’t really appeal to me, but to each his own. Sometimes lighthearted/kids/simple games are nice to relax and relieve stress. Or just plain go crazy on them for fun.

          Thanks for the D3 info. I stayed with D2 when Resurrection came out so I’m a bit clueless about 3.

          • buedi@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah, I guess as long as it´s fun, it´s not wrong :-)

            D3 plays very different from D2. There are set items which give you insane power if you have them. Some sets only include 2 items, some up to 6 items and you get huge power boosts for specific skills when wearing as much of them as possible. As an example, the Bones of Rathma Set gives you a 9000% power increase for a certain skill when you wear the full set. Because of that in D3 your goal usually is to get a full set of whatever fits your playstyle and once you have it you are basically a god that shreds everything in its way. It gets a pretty quick game after that. So in a new season you usually try to level up as quickly as possible to 70, try to complete your set and start shredding mobs. Totally different to what you have in D2. I think that is the reason why some folks love one of them but can’t stand the other one. They are very different.