Bill was introduced in Sep/25, but I only got a whiff of it in the last couple of weeks

See House Bill HB1878: https://fastdemocracy.com/bill-search/pa/2025-2026/bills/PAB00038963/

Are there any other states/countries taking similar initiatives?

Summary:

Pennsylvania homeowners deserve the right to choose native plant species they desire for landscaping around their homes. However, work is needed to remove bottlenecks for homeowners to select native vegetation for their desired landscaping.

This legislation will prevent homeowners associations (HOAs) from unreasonably prohibiting the use of native plants for landscaping on private property. This ensures homeowners residing within an HOA the same ability to choose native landscaping as other homeowners.

Native plants provide many beneficial functions that many homeowners desire. These include being aesthetically pleasing and providing habitat for pollinators while being adapted to the site and typically requiring lower maintenance than non-native plants. […]

  • bridgeburner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 months ago

    Kinda funny how Americans call their country “land of the free” but can’t even do certain things on THEIR OWN PROPERTY because of the HOAs.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 months ago

      Should we go down the list of things Americans can’t do but the rest of the world can? The irony of holding up freedom as their cornerstone while keeping the largest inmate population over bullshit without even a trial.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      When you’re in an HOA, you’ve contracted away some of your rights to property.

      But that’s the devil’s game of “property rights”. So many people think they’ve gained sovereignty because money changed hands. They don’t ask how property originates and why it was up for sale to begin with.

    • spacesatan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not a contradiction. HOAs suck but they’re a contractual relationship that you enter voluntarily.

          • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            and you’ve never run afoul of an HOA in a property you rent? my first time getting an HOA infraction was in an apartment i was renting for $400 a month because i put my clothes out on a drying wrack while i was at work because i couldn’t afford to run the drier

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        it’s just that any development built after Clinton requires you to enter that contract or the bank won’t approve your loan

        • glitch1985@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Which is needed in developments since the houses are closer together and it just takes one person turning their front yard into a used car lot to drive down property values and annoy everyone else.

          • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sane countries handle this with local public authorities.

            If your garden becomes a tip in the UK the council will step in

          • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            A. Thats what zoning board is for.

            B. If you dont want bad neighbors, dont buy near neighbors

              • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                somehow my point has been again lost so let me state it more clearly this time:

                most people subject to HOAs are so because being picky about housing is a privilege it’s rare to have access to

                • spacesatan@leminal.space
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Oh no, not the poor upper middle class homeowners who were forced to buy in a neighborhood that has a strict HOA whose primary purpose is to keep property values high.

                  • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    and the lower middle class homeowners, and the lower class renters. any development after around '98. you will deal with an HOA.

                    yes. HOAs primarily exist to serve capital, but they don’t always act as rules enforcement against the homeowner. often who gets the rules enforced against them is someone who picked that neighborhood based on it was what they could afford near enough their work for their whole life to be affordable.