• Frigg [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      29 days ago

      Absolute coward shit that the very first thing you feel the need to do is denounce Iran given everything that’s going on

      • Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        29 days ago

        Just because the US and Israel have decided to be an axis of evil doesn’t mean that the Iranian government is all of the sudden good guys.

        The Iranian people are victims and all of this. They did try democracy and we bombed them for it. Their government is not run by good people and that is also our fault.

        • KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Abstract moralism is the luxury of those shielded by imperialism. To condemn Iran in a vacuum like you do, is liberal idealism. The material reality is a state under constant siege by U.S. capital and its Zionist proxy.

          While the Islamic Republic is problematic, its resistance objectively fractures imperialist hegemony. Orthodox Marxists offer critical support: we defend Iran’s sovereignty against sanctions and regime change as a blow against the imperial core, while maintaining political independence from their theocratic policies. We can walk and chew bubble gum at the same time.

          To ignore the principal contradiction (Imperialism vs. Oppressed Nation) is social-imperialism.

        • gressen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Making all that hardware is bad for the environment and blowing it up will simply require more wasteful manufacturing and will put even more pressure the prices.

            • gressen@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              29 days ago

              Of course not. Are you being absurd for a specific reason? Both production and use are bad, won’t you agree?

          • orc girly@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            29 days ago

            They might decide the risk is too high and stop building. Not that they make rational decisions enough for us to know for sure but I think that’s the hope.

            • gressen@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              29 days ago

              I sure hope so they stop. I’m just worried they will make some dumb decisions based on their own slop machine output.

        • gressen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          I have not said that. All I’m saying is that destroying high end hardware is bad for the environment, because it will lead to more manufacturing. It is wasteful. Instead cut their power or something.

          • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            29 days ago

            I feel like those are criticisms that should be leveled at the people who built the thing specifically designed to exterminate life on the planet by heating it up as fast as is physically possible with current technology.

            If a machine is destroying life, it would be nice to be able to reuse bits for farming or something but just stopping the extinction is sufficient.

            Execute all executives.

        • gressen@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          They have no significant profits anyway, but the loss of hardware will result in increase in supplier orders.