I assume this has been covered already (I’m new), and I welcome recommendations of existing material! (E.g. Imperialism by Lenin seems like it’d be relevant)
I’m reading State and Revolution, and am trying to map it to the conditions in the US.
From chapter 2 (emphasis mine):
The overthrow of bourgeois rule can be accomplished only by the proletariat, the particular class whose economic conditions of existence prepare it for this task and provide it with the possibility and the power to perform it. While the bourgeoisie break up and disintegrate the peasantry and all the petty-bourgeois groups, they weld together, unite and organize the proletariat. Only the proletariat — by virtue of the economic role it plays in large-scale production — is capable of being the leader of all the working and exploited people, whom the bourgeoisie exploit, oppress and crush, often not less but more than they do the proletarians, but who are incapable of waging an independent struggle for their emancipation.
My understanding is that large-scale production has largely been moved outside of the US. I imagine this is also true of most imperial core countries.
If that’s true, doesn’t it follow that the US has a small, relatively weak proletariat?
And if THAT’S true, what’s the path to revolution in the US? Without a powerful proletariat, there can’t be a proletarian revolution, right?
I could see one answer being:
- Weaken US imperialism (e.g. through revolutions in imperial periphery)
- US is forced to re-develop it’s own productive capacity
- Developed productive capacity results in strong proletariat
- (Wait for contradictions to sharpen?)
- Revolution
Another (more likely?) could be:
- Get conquered
In both of those cases, the immediate work is to weaken the power of the US as a whole, right?
What are the main tools the US uses to project power, and how could orgs weaken them from within? Organize, obviously, but organize to do what? Mutual aid and unions seem clear, anything else?
I’d also be curious about any work on other paths to revolution in the imperial core. This might be straying outside of Marxist-Leninism, but has there been any theory around a revolution lead by a different class?
E.g. perhaps a deeply racist country could have a revolution based on race? …though the majority of people in the US are white. E.g. the black panthers were threatening enough that the state infiltrated and killed them.
Anyway. Interested in y’all’s thoughts - sorry if these are basic questions.
Settlers is good! I’d personally start with Lenin’s Imperialism, the Current Highest Stage of Capitalism, then explore Nkrumah’s Neocolonialism, the Last Stage of Imperialism and then Cheng Enfu’s Five Characteristics of Neoimperialism. All of these help trace how late stage capitalism has dealt with its own existence in decay, as international plunder morphing over time.
As for what defines a proletarian, it’s someone who sells their labor power to a capitalist to produce commodities. An example of a proletarian engineer is one who works for a firm, and is paid in wages, while a petite bourgeois engineer would be a small business owner that takes their pay in profits. The peasantry typically pay rent in kind, ie they give up a portion of what they produce and keep the rest, bartering it or selling it on the market for what they don’t produce. Sectors do have impact, but not as a different class, but different strata of the same class.