I suspect it’s so they can prosecute abusers who film unequivocally bad things, since this removes any room for interpretation or coaching the victims so the abuser can get off on a technicality.
That’s my best guess as to why it would be written like that. We might be getting primed by the headline to interpret it uncharitably.
Well that’s a lot more specific than the headline and also like… really hard to prove. That and why would it just be in one context it’s not allowed?
I suspect it’s so they can prosecute abusers who film unequivocally bad things, since this removes any room for interpretation or coaching the victims so the abuser can get off on a technicality.
That’s my best guess as to why it would be written like that. We might be getting primed by the headline to interpret it uncharitably.