mudkip@lemdro.id to Crappy Design@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 4 months agoSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moeexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up160
arrow-up160external-linkSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Crappy Design@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI’d say statistics knowledge is probably related to wether you’ve studied it or not, not so much your iq score
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoAnd a person with low IQ probably wouldn’t study much statistics. Probably.
minus-squareVictor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 day agoIn a way it is? 94 is below average, and I don’t think even the average person is representative of someone who knows about the normal distribution.
I’d say statistics knowledge is probably related to wether you’ve studied it or not, not so much your iq score
And a person with low IQ probably wouldn’t study much statistics. Probably.
90-100 isnt low
In a way it is? 94 is below average, and I don’t think even the average person is representative of someone who knows about the normal distribution.