A new study published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics by three researchers at Radboud University in the Netherlands has dramatically
I read something that suggests this to be the case, something about some constant not matching up with observations of expansion rates. Roger Penrose was talking about it iirc.
But then the universe is everything right? Who’s to say there wasn’t “another universe” before the big bang?
That doesn’t make the big bang the beginning of life either way
Fair enough, science was always my worst subject (despite my best attempts.)
I read something that suggests this to be the case, something about some constant not matching up with observations of expansion rates. Roger Penrose was talking about it iirc.
That is an existing hypothesis, yes. That the universe is cyclical.
much like the cyclical nature of most other things within the universe… it would make sense.