I would make an argument that the government requiring this constitutes violations of the 4th amendment. There is no legitimate Constitutional reason for the government to have biometrics on all owners of any OS. Those who sacrifice liberty in the name of security deserve neither.
I imagine this is the angle that groups like ACLU will pursue. At least if it stretches into strong identification. Seems like a direct analog to the already-established precedent regarding “stop and identify” statutes.
Though, MFW I’m in a “construct a legal system based on vibes and class warfare” competition and my opponent is the US
I would make an argument that the government requiring this constitutes violations of the 4th amendment. There is no legitimate Constitutional reason for the government to have biometrics on all owners of any OS. Those who sacrifice liberty in the name of security deserve neither.
I imagine this is the angle that groups like ACLU will pursue. At least if it stretches into strong identification. Seems like a direct analog to the already-established precedent regarding “stop and identify” statutes.
Though, MFW I’m in a “construct a legal system based on vibes and class warfare” competition and my opponent is the US