A new survey found that Gen Z workers are particularly invested in sabotaging their company's AI deployments.
  • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    31·
    14 days ago

    C-suite executives, meanwhile, are facing the heavy burden of squeezing blood from AI’s proverbial stone. 72 percent of all surveyed execs said their company’s AI strategy is causing them stress or anxiety, 32 percent of whom characterize their stress as “high” or “crippling.”

    lol, lmao

    • DragonBallZinn [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
      15·
      14 days ago

      72 percent of all surveyed execs said their company’s AI strategy is causing them stress or anxiety, 32 percent of whom characterize their stress as “high” or “crippling.”

      Oh boo hoo. Poor widdle babies. Sooooo much stress from literally being bad to sleep on your ass while working class folks are being starved of their livelihoods.

      How the fuck are they better than me. They keep getting more more more good things shoved in their face, and I’m supposed to feel bad porky is sooo scared of his own super good luck he’s in the fetal position? What a fucking baby!

  • supafuzz [comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
    14·
    14 days ago

    in my experience there’s very little sabotage required, the chatbots aren’t actually good for much. see: https://www.wheresyoured.at/i-will-never-respect-a-website/

    some people think they’re good at coding but I haven’t seen it. they make a lot of code but a lot of it is wrong, and you’ve still got (optimistically) the same number of engineers as before to review the output. building the scaffolding to get something useful out of coding agents is time-consuming, the results are brittle, and your chatbot or agent framework vendor can break it at any time.

    the only unalloyed wins for llms that I’ve been able to find are:

    • scripting tasks that require image recognition
    • language translation

    even 30b local models are very, very good at these.