And where did that bring you? Back to me
If you cared to hear his full speech, he made it very clear that while he is not going to provide city-funded bisexual girlfriends, he’s going to be the bisexual boyfriend to whoever wants him, please provide his full speech instead of just cherry-picking quotes out of context. Be better.
In typical democrat fashion, he’s going to provide bicurious boyfriends to everyone who’s ran a small business in an impoverished neighborhood for five years
Sigh* see this is why electorialism is a dead end.
We can’t keep letting fake leftists confound us like this!
It’s because he’s providing queer enby polycules instead. He’s just that based
There aren’t enough bisexual girlfriends for everyone.
Unless…
“I have a suggestion”
Meets Obama once…
He’s exacting his revenge for not getting with that ethereal bisexual back in college.
The reference
Looking back, it’s embarrassing to recognize the degree to which my intellectual curiosity those first two years of college paralleled the interests of various women I was attempting to get to know: Marx and Marcuse so I had something to say to the long-legged socialist who lived in my dorm; Fanon and Gwendolyn Brooks for the smooth-skinned sociology major who never gave me a second look; Foucault and Woolf for the ethereal bisexual who wore mostly black. As a strategy for picking up girls, my pseudo-intellectualism proved mostly worthless; I found myself in a series of affectionate but chaste friendships.
–Barack Obama, A Promised Land, Chapter 1
!electoralism in shambles
Tough, but fair
What zero materialism does to a motherfucker. Sad.
This clip is from October 29 2025. Also beware that Pamphlets posts a lot of fake stuff.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/zohran-mamdanis-private-influencer-briefing-rcna240260
This is clearly a joke. If someone wanted to sincerely critique mamdani, there are very recent things to discuss
Why are you replying this to me? I just think it’s misleading that Pamphlets tweet says “breaking” when it happened 6 months ago.
I misunderstood the direction of your critique, pamphlets is being misleading if they were being sincere
An example is that the Pamphlets account often posts fake things about DPRK and Kim Jong Un. Pamphlets account had posted that DPRK had captured 2 suspected Israeli spies and executed them. This would have been a cool thing, but it did not happen. I searched KCNA, Rodong Sinmun, etc and there was no article. There was also no article in western media.
It might be a joke, but I saw many people believing that it was a real thing. Sometimes the Pamphlets account posts real stories. Sometimes the Pamphlets account post fake stories. I’m just saying if you see something interesting on that account, verify it by a reliable source. And if people want to learn about DPRK, they should read KCNA or Rodong Sinmun.
