• ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Perhaps you’re expecting all colonies to be plantations? The British plantations such as North America, Australia and NZ are still as you’d expect. But most of the empire was run for profit rather than plantation. These colonies were administered by British (later a mix of British and indigenous) civil servants and garrisons but there was no intention to build a lasting presence. The British Empire even told itself it would hand back the non-plantations after they had been “set right” for the benefit of the natives.

    • Horsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      The point I’m getting at with colonial powers was that English/French was forced onto the locals in one way or the other. Also, British/French citizens moved to the colonies and maintained a permanent presence there, which had lasting impact all over the world.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        They didn’t tend to move permanently unless it was a plantation, they were there for a job and moved back after.

        • Horsey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          They weren’t constantly rotating those positions though? I’m not saying the colonies became fully integrated like how France’s modern colonial empire.

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            In those places, yea the British contingent were fully segregated from the locals, living in what would now be termed Green Zones. They didn’t mix with the locals.