• RamenJunkie@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That one about investing the savings is horse shit. Apartment rent these days is essentially the same cost or more of just buying. Plus, at the end ofnthe say, you still don’t have a home. Your saved stock market money still won’t be enoughto ever buy one because pricing is inflated now. Plus, you are retiring and don’t have a place to love because you have no income to pay rent with.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      No, it isn’t.

      You don’t have a home if you get forced into foreclosure either.

      You can live a whole life not owning a home.

      Over the last 15 years, a 401k you’re making steady contributions to, from the gap between then median home mortgage and median rent, that returns more than all the total costs that go into homeownership, and the home’s appreciation.

      Yeah, this isn’t true everywhere, housing markets are local and regional.

      But broadly, what I’ve said is true.

      I’d show you the math, but you’ve already made up your mind, and you’re arguing about switching to this strategy now, which is a totally different discussion… so you probably wouldn’t be able to keep the math straight anyway.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, buying is more expensive, that’s why people rent. That down payment would be a huge initial investment. Once you’re old and your portfolio has grown, you can pay rent anywhere in the world, not just where you earned the house.