🚨 KITE Insta Analysis: A 25% US tariff on EU autos would hit Europe’s automotive core hard. In our KITE simulation, 🇩🇪 Germany’s auto-sector output falls by almost €15bn in the short run and about €30bn in the long run. Losses are also sizeable in 🇮🇹 Italy, 🇸🇰 Slovakia, and 🇸🇪 Sweden.

The broader macro hit is smaller than the sectoral one — but still meaningful. Real value added falls most in 🇸🇰 Slovakia (around -0.85% short run), followed by 🇩🇪 Germany, 🇭🇺 Hungary, and 🇸🇪 Sweden. This is what deeply integrated auto supply chains look like under tariff stress.

For 🇩🇪 Germany, the EU remains by far the biggest destination for automotive exports. But outside Europe, the 🇺🇸 US is the single most important market — ahead of 🇨🇳 China and 🇬🇧 the UK. That helps explain why US auto tariffs would bite German industry so directly.

For the EU as a whole, the biggest extra-EU destinations for automotive exports are the 🇺🇸 US and 🇬🇧 UK, followed by 🇨🇳 China, 🇹🇷 Türkiye, and 🇨🇭 Switzerland. So even a sector-specific US tariff would hit one of the EU’s most important external export markets.
As always, huge CAVEAT: We don’t have any details beyond “25% on EU automotives”. So these simulations give us direction and sense of magnitude, no “exact” forecast
Source: Julian Hinz on X/Twitter.


I’m begging you: Don’t.
BMW and VW are both already way too big to be effectively regulated, making any government cave in to their demands. They are the main reason Germany in particular is trying to reverse the ban on new combustion engines. Let us just rip this band aid off or this will fester until there’s no oil left to burn.
No, they are not. Simply all the necessary infrastructures are not ready (by a long shot) to phase out ICE engines.
Do you have any sources for that?
It is something everyone can see:
While I agree on the spirit of the law, switching to EV cars are a good idea IF we can solve the problem of recharging them all, but not on the execution.
Simply setting a date without planning for everything else is plain stupid. Something like Germany did closing the nuclear power plants without any plan about how to replace them if not some vague “renewable energy” charade.
Not all EU countries are in the same situation, I agree, and manufacturer are only partially responsible for this, most of the responsability is from past governments that did not have the ball, and foresight, to decide for impopular (at the time) solutions that could have made easier today.
No. It is not something everyone can see.
Worked in the field.
As above, worked in the field. The numbers are agnostic to what big oil tells.
Not everyone live near a highway. And charging station in small towns are the point unless you accept that to charge your car you need to drive 50km to the nearest highway, if even present.
True. And national laws supersede local laws, so unless you have not a sufficient number of charging station in small towns EV will not be that usefull. But I am no seeing any laws that force local politicians to solve the problem, it is more the will of the single politician than an organic job.
I am not saying anything about your myth and I know that I can charge with a normal Schuko outlet.
Problems rises when you live somewhere (condos) where other people do not let install your own outlet in your own garage citing security concern (stupid I agree), or you have just a parking spot in the condos which is not that near to your home. Let’s not start to talk about the cars simply parked on the street…
What do you suggest ? That people use a 50/100 meters long extension cord ? Or to demolish the apartment building (or entire neighborhoods) and rebuild them so that everyone can charge their car from a home outlet ? These are the problems with the charging stations, not the “20 kw station” myth.
To have ready few years from now you need to start today. I never understand the logic of people like you that think that “few years from now” everything will be ready while today we are not doing anything to have it.
Because they impose a date withot any planning. Simply deciding the date without a complete planning is useless.
It is not because of this. It is because people saw “ok, from 2030 no more ICE cars sold” but do not saw any of the things you have to do to be ready to switch.
Where are the work on the grid upgrade ? Where are the laws to make it easier to install charging stations (basically removing a lot of NIMBY excuses and nonsense) ? Where are the laws to stop any fucking town’s council or HOA equivalent from exercising veto power over panel and wind turbine installation, both for personal use and big power generation ?
There are a lot of thing we should do before deciding that after a certain date we should not sell anymore ICE cars.
I repeat, switching to EV cars is a good idea, I agree on the spirit of the law but I cannot ignore the problems the law has.
Well, here is my source that it’s automakers.: “German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has led arguments against the ban, citing weak demand for electric vehicles in Europe and the dominance of Chinese automakers in the EV sector.”
I know about it.
But ask yourself: why there is a weak demand if an EV car is so much more convient ?
Merz probably just aknoledge that there are problems and currently people do not consider EV cars as a valid alternative.
Or maybe the vast majority of people live in a place/situation where charging an EV car is too of a burden, charging time excluded.