• roberto [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 days ago

    They are:

    [user@shithouse:/tmp/dirtyfrag] > lsmod | grep -E '(esp|rxrpc)'
    esp6                   28672  0
    rxrpc                 258048  0
    ip6_udp_tunnel         16384  1 rxrpc
    udp_tunnel             20480  1 rxrpc
    esp4                   28672  0
    
    [user@shithouse:/tmp/dirtyfrag] > zgrep -Ei '(rxrpc|inet.?_esp)' /proc/config.gz 
    CONFIG_INET_ESP=m
    CONFIG_INET_ESP_OFFLOAD=m
    CONFIG_INET_ESPINTCP=y
    CONFIG_INET6_ESP=m
    CONFIG_INET6_ESP_OFFLOAD=m
    CONFIG_INET6_ESPINTCP=y
    CONFIG_AF_RXRPC=m
    # CONFIG_AF_RXRPC_IPV6 is not set
    # CONFIG_AF_RXRPC_INJECT_LOSS is not set
    # CONFIG_AF_RXRPC_DEBUG is not set
    
    • kungen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 days ago

      What distro? Check dmesg, it’s probably AppArmor blocking unprivileged_userns.

      • roberto [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 days ago

        Void.

        Kernel log has only these two messages from when the modules were loaded, none after that:

        [12660744.186643] Initializing XFRM netlink socket
        [12660751.925450] NET: Registered PF_RXRPC protocol family
        

        No apparmor:

        CONFIG_LSM="landlock,yama,loadpin,safesetid,integrity"
        
        [user@shithouse:~] > aa-enabled
        No - disabled at boot.
        

        Isn’t half of the exploit intended to work around apparmor?