I know this is a bold thesis. It is meant to provoke thought and encourage debate. Here are some of the considerations that led me to it:

  • Europe depends on US military protection, and the US uses this “alliance” as leverage -> NATO gives Washington structural influence over European security choices.

  • US tech firms dominate Europe’s cloud and software stack, creating digital dependency. Also, European data often sits under infrastructure exposed to US legal and corporate power.

  • Russian energy dependence was a problem for Europe when the Ukraine war started. The US were quite eager when it came to “help” by replacing the Russian energy dependence with American energy dependence.

  • US sanctions policy often forces Europe to absorb costs for Washington’s geopolitical priorities.

  • American platforms shape European speech, commerce, administration, and most importantly: public debate.

  • “Strategic autonomy” exists as a slogan because dependency is already the default.

    • zeroConnection@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      So what???

      If those people thought a petulant toddler was their best leader to lead, TWICE, just what does it make those people?

      Do you think smart people would have elected him twice?

      • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        just what does it make those people?

        I don’t know. I’m not trying anymore to understand them.