iByteABit@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoRemember when they were calling for regime change in China because of mass surveillance? This is the USA todaywww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1378cross-posted to: privacy@programming.devvideos@sopuli.xyzvideos@lemmy.mltechnology@hexbear.net
arrow-up1378external-linkRemember when they were calling for regime change in China because of mass surveillance? This is the USA todaywww.youtube.comiByteABit@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@programming.devvideos@sopuli.xyzvideos@lemmy.mltechnology@hexbear.net
minus-squareDessalines@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up17·2 days agoBasically either the more honest, and less competent imperialists, vs the dishonest, more competent imperialists.
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up15·2 days agoYeah, it’s actually more complicated than just being mask-on vs mask-off. It turns out that only the competents wear their mask, because they’re competent enough to know why they’re wearing a mask. The incompetents think that masks are woke.
Basically either the more honest, and less competent imperialists, vs the dishonest, more competent imperialists.
Yeah, it’s actually more complicated than just being mask-on vs mask-off. It turns out that only the competents wear their mask, because they’re competent enough to know why they’re wearing a mask. The incompetents think that masks are woke.