fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoReferences: [1] out of his assmander.xyzimagemessage-square157fedilinkarrow-up1565
arrow-up1565imageReferences: [1] out of his assmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square157fedilink
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up38·1 month ago parallel dimension Aren’t dimensions by definition orthogonal?
minus-squarecmhe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoThat is true for space dimensions, but there is also a time dimension, and would another dimension, that is ‘orthogonal’ to a time dimension not be some kind of dimension that offers alternative time lines?
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month ago So we have six primary orthogonal directions (up/down, left/right, back/forth), These are 3 dimensions, not 6.
minus-squareImpractical_Island@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoLeft is not orthogonal to right. any being can möbiate beyond Surely you can only möbiate by twisting back on yourself. I think i saw karmic fetters and the existence-illusion complex at Glastonbury.
minus-squareImpractical_Island@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoRemoved by mod
minus-squaredeft@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThere is not a single thing we know about dimensions. I don’t believe it
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 month agoMathematically we know a lot about dimensions. Usually it’s just adding an extra variable.
minus-squareHarneyToker@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month agoI know a thing or two about the first three, thank you.
minus-squaredeft@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoYeah?! What’s their middle name then?
minus-squarecabillaud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoWhat about infinite dimensions?
Aren’t dimensions by definition orthogonal?
Got’em
That is true for space dimensions, but there is also a time dimension, and would another dimension, that is ‘orthogonal’ to a time dimension not be some kind of dimension that offers alternative time lines?
Removed by mod
These are 3 dimensions, not 6.
Removed by mod
Left is not orthogonal to right.
Surely you can only möbiate by twisting back on yourself.
I think i saw karmic fetters and the existence-illusion complex at Glastonbury.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
There is not a single thing we know about dimensions. I don’t believe it
Mathematically we know a lot about dimensions. Usually it’s just adding an extra variable.
I know a thing or two about the first three, thank you.
Yeah?! What’s their middle name then?
3rd “Lionel” Dimension
What about infinite dimensions?