• djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 hours ago

    this is the part that really baffles me, though I guess I can’t expect much from the class that seems to be literally incapable of foresight.

    Like say AI actually does get there. Some company is able to crack human consciousness and we get truly intelligent AI, good enough to replace your workforce with… that AI isn’t going to be free. It’s going to be a monthly fee for your business. and then when you’re fully reliant on AI, when skilled labor is simply too difficult to cultivate any further, it’s going to inevitably enshittify. These corpos will end up slaves to the AI company.

    It’s like they fundamentally cannot see that they are giving up control. They’re so fucking stupid.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      This is what happens when mfkers don’t read any Marx.

      American capitalism would be doing way better at profit maximizing if people in positions of power across the private sector had studied Marxian economics. Giving away your means of production as a software business would be an obvious no-no.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      A lot of AI contracts and services were priced assuming literally everyone was going to adopt it so the MLMs all tried to undercut each other to get market share.

      Turns out, not everyone wants it and they undercharged significantly so the snake oil salesmen are jacking up their prices to try and stay viable. Leaving a companies that early shrunk their workforce holding the bag paying more in expenses and lower productivity because they bought in to the bubble without even checking how factual claims were.

    • Mucki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      The whole AI scam has always been the techbro CEOs snatching the money from the non-techbro CEOs. Me or you as a private person was never the direct aim. . . . General artificial intelligence will not come. We don’t even have artificial intelligence yet. The terms artificial and intelligence contradict themselves. It’s an oxymoron. It’s still just machines that learn shit without body and soul…

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    My boss is getting annoying with this shit.

    I’m stuck on x issue

    Have you tried putting x into ai?

    Yes I’ve been doing that for two days.

    Really? Huh. It should work.

    K well no it doesn’t.

    Just copy the error and put it into Claude

    Yeah…I’ve been…doing that.

    It should just give you the solution

    • HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The AI craze among the Epstein class has revealed some indisputable facts in a way more obvious than ever before:

      1. The rich hate the poor and hold a genuine, malicious and sadistic desire to see them suffer and die. Its not just a consequence of their pursuit of money, it’s an outright explicit goal
      2. The ruling class is abhorrently incompetent, increadibly lazy, and inconceivably stupid. There is no group of people less qualified to lead the world than the class of people who currently lead the world.
      3. There is no “things will change before they become irreversible”. The ONLY answer is to eliminate the Epstein class. They will lead the world to Armageddon with a smile on their dead faces.
      4. Technology under capitalism doesn’t become mainstream when it has sufficiently satisfied the problems it promises to solve. It becomes mainstream FAR before it is ready because the Epstein class thinks its magic.
    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      AI CEOs might end up doing better, you know?
      At least better than the type of human CEOs that decide to go full AI.

      • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Probably not, AI CEOs will be trained on data from how real CEOs work … so AI CEOs will make all the same problems, with all the same gas lighting that they are doing a great job. Also the AI CEOs will be provided by megacorp models so you just know they will be biased to benefit the owner mega corp over all else.

      • wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The trouble with that, I feel, may lie in the subtle differences between

        • the CEO kind of psychopath: batshit unplugged for sure, no contest; just enough to make fucktons of money for far too few people, but not too cracked that they blow everything up, instead…

        • and, any given bot’s penchant for going off the fucking’ rails in record time, every time —which, unless you short the whole thing, makes the opposite of money.

        🤭

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s management who fucked up, but let’s blame it on software because what we really care about is hating the software.

  • plateee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think some CEOs are probably okay with it costing more - that’s less benefits to pay out, less PTO/sick days to deal with, and less labor concerns when you run your AI slop machine 24/7 instead of those pesky 40 hour work weeks.

    AI will have to cost a lot more, or hurt the bottom line other ways (people stop buying your AI shit).

    • bookmeat@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Yea, and less control over your spending. The AI provider has the business by the balls and can change prices any time. And they will, by a lot, as soon as they secure enough market share.

    • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 hours ago

      AI is already hurting their bottom line, but they keep fantasizing about the future gains, that actually will not arrive. Ever.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They are being sold on the hype that AGI is possible and that eventually the costs won’t matter because somehow the AI brains will scale production massively and allow the already obscenely wealthy privatize the gains of humanity while letting millions of us die as their solution to the climate change caused by AGI. Essentially they have no issues poisoning us and wasting money now as long as they get their supreme digital slaves in place and never need human labor again. Deeply unlikely but nobody said these folks are smart.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Considering that consciousness and intelligence arise out of complexity… it should be “possible.”

        But we’re not really anywhere near that reality yet. These dumb ass ai are just really good at glazing their users while speaking confidently so everyone buys what they say.

        • Ethan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Possible in the sense that biological brains and human brains aren’t special. But no one will ever convince me that large language models (I’m talking about the actual math and programming that they use today for “AI”) will ever be actually intelligent.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Right, definitely not impossible, but highly improbable to be based off of LLMs. The focus on LLMs is actually limiting other types of AI research.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    And get it blatantly wrong… not that a human wont also, but just like the computer, humans can be conditioned to defend the exploitative conditions of their own existence.

  • Botzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    33 minutes ago

    I spent an hour today on a webinar about how to optimize token usage with more than 500 other participants from the company I work for. Because billing is about to have its come-to-Jesus moment.