I was being far too hostile to you and attacking you for a position you don’t actually hold, I’ve seen way too many people act like this is some Great Man Theory nonsense and Delcy was some kind of sinister scheming vizier vying for the Throne of Venezuela, and that all it takes to destroy a socialist state is replacing a “good leader” with a “bad leader”, just complete lib ahistorical nonsense, which isn’t what you were saying. People acting like Venezuela just collapsed suddenly overnight the instant Maduro was captured as if the whole country relied solely on him.
But it’s not fair to attack you for a position you don’t actually hold, sorry for that.
I’m literally the person arguing that you can and should resist the hegemon and acquiescence isn’t inevitable.
Do you read posts before you respond, or do you just go off your inherent belief that you’re the one true communist?
And how do you even square your belief that you’re the one true communist with your seeming belief that actually revisionism isn’t worth criticising?
I was being far too hostile to you and attacking you for a position you don’t actually hold, I’ve seen way too many people act like this is some Great Man Theory nonsense and Delcy was some kind of sinister scheming vizier vying for the Throne of Venezuela, and that all it takes to destroy a socialist state is replacing a “good leader” with a “bad leader”, just complete lib ahistorical nonsense, which isn’t what you were saying. People acting like Venezuela just collapsed suddenly overnight the instant Maduro was captured as if the whole country relied solely on him.
But it’s not fair to attack you for a position you don’t actually hold, sorry for that.