PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前What do you mean mechs are non-credible?lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1417
arrow-up1417imageWhat do you mean mechs are non-credible?lemmy.dbzer0.comPugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square68fedilink
minus-squaredublet@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·2 年前Ah but the bipedal mech suits could crawl along to floor, given a really low profile. Tank can’t do that. Checkmate. /s
minus-squareeestileib@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 年前I want to see a Raven crawling on the floor with a low profile. A Dire Wolf would be quite something too.
minus-squareNielsBohron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 年前Didn’t the original tabletop BT rules allow for mechs to lie prone for better accuracy and defense? And mechs that didn’t have arm actuators had a penalty to standing back up?
Ah but the bipedal mech suits could crawl along to floor, given a really low profile. Tank can’t do that. Checkmate.
/s
I want to see a Raven crawling on the floor with a low profile.
A Dire Wolf would be quite something too.
Didn’t the original tabletop BT rules allow for mechs to lie prone for better accuracy and defense? And mechs that didn’t have arm actuators had a penalty to standing back up?