Nothing, does it make you angry? Seems to be trying to connect some failed Chinese project with “the liberal mind”, but to me it’s incomprehensible. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The below photo is before. It’s what westerners saw as incomprehensible, the whole “ghost cities” narrative, and the above is the result of sound planning.
You’re the one that describes it as rage bait, and you also managed to solidly illustrate the point by assuming it’s about “some failed Chinese project”. It’s not, but it does indeed demonstrate the liberal mind that you automatically assumed it is
I guess it’s better to just ignore ragebait.
What about this makes you angry?
Nothing, does it make you angry? Seems to be trying to connect some failed Chinese project with “the liberal mind”, but to me it’s incomprehensible. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The metro station is a part of successful planning, what part of this is “failed” to you?
In the second photo it looks abandoned. IDK dude, whatever.
The below photo is before. It’s what westerners saw as incomprehensible, the whole “ghost cities” narrative, and the above is the result of sound planning.
That was the earlier photo, the developed city scene is the after photo, after the successful implementation of their planning.
Incomprehensible? You can’t figure out what’s being said here?
No, and I can’t figure out why my trivial comments are important enough harp on. I’m done here.
Read the article.
You’re the one that describes it as rage bait, and you also managed to solidly illustrate the point by assuming it’s about “some failed Chinese project”. It’s not, but it does indeed demonstrate the liberal mind that you automatically assumed it is
It’s not a rage bait but they still raged lol.