Nah, you already admitted you’re not actually willing to behave in good faith

Wikipedia disagrees with you.

I am once again begging liberals to stop treating Wikipedia like it’s The Holy Scripture.

So your answer continues to be no.

You already confirmed your answer to my question is no, you don’t have to keep doing it.

And you already tried the “STRAWMAN!” incantation.

So the answer to my question is no, you aren’t actually willing to do that

Are you actually willing to talk without resorting to insults, misapplying formal debate jargon you don’t understand, or misrepresenting what was previously said?

Apparently you are

Damn, now you’re gone from copy pasting retorts you didn’t understand from Wikipedia from copy pasting retorts you didn’t understand from me

You would participate in a good faith conversation because you have intelligent opinions

Why? When you’re just going to respond with copy pasting reddit debate incantations, lying, and talking like an anime villain. Which is exactly what you continue to do.

or just keep hissing and spitting, whatever.

That’s you, boo.

I’m here but you haven’t made any good faith effort to contribute to the conversation for several comments.

Why would I try to converse in good faith with someone who responds by randomly copy pasting Latin from Wikipedia because reddit taught them that’s what debate is, while consistently talking in the most smug, condescending and disingenuous tone imaginable?

I see you discovered more magic invocations to parrot.

What’s the matter, run out of Wikipedia incantations?

Still going down your list of magic debate spells, wandering why none of them are working

Was there ever a time you didn’t talk like the cringeist nerd on Reddit?

Their original comment absolutely did not imply they thought that it was only MAGAheads

Yes it absolutely did. Stop being deliberately obtuse.

u mad bro!

Wow, I didn’t realize it was 2012 again

So you can’t point to where I said it explicitly.

Hypocrite

Oh look, you’ve suddenly flipped back to demanding explicit quotes, when previously you accepted implications.

Hypocrite.

You comment strongly implied

Oooooh, so now you’re willing to accept implied statements!

What happened to demanding explicit quotes only? Which implicit is exactly the opposite of.

And yes, there is the same strong implication in their comment