• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was an analogy. I don’t want to block you. I want to have an intelligent discussion about the merits of this act. But people just want to defend America despite its despotic acts. It makes me sad.

    • legion02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The analogy is closer to you getting banned by a lemmy instance for breaking their rules when replying to comments from another instance. Just because you’re abroad doesn’t mean you’re ungoverned.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is no governance between states.

        International law (also known as public international law and the law of nations) is the set of guidelines, norms, and standards usually forming the default behavior between states. Inter means between thus outside of territories thus absent of sovereignty, thus isn’t a law at all (See: Westphalian System) and is rather a common-practice between states - unless they wish otherwise due to their own reasoning. (Source](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law).

        • legion02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This isn’t an action between states. A US based company bought oil from Iran (hence why it’s Iranian oil, they’re referencing origin, not ownership) to sell to China. That us based company was found to be in violation of US sanctions against Iran. They capitulated because they still wish to do business in the US.