Range is said to be 205 mi (330 km), higher than the original estimate. This price is for the basic truck. The SUV configuration is expected to be $5000 more.

  • tychosmoose@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The modular approach is very appealing to me, even though I have little use for a pickup truck. For example, I read that the SUV configuration moves the back glass to the end of the SUV shell when you install it. That makes the SUV top lighter and cheaper.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Oh, that explains why the fastback is more expensive than the squareback. I’d been wondering about that.

      • burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There must be a range difference. That’s how I’ll talk myself into the fastback, not just because it looks cooler.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I’m torn because the fastback looks cooler but it has less cargo capacity (both inside and on the roof rack).

          Then again, I also really like the “open air kit” which apparently requires the squareback, so maybe the decision would be easy.