• naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, and I also thought, they’d go more like straight for the target like Stingers

      That was an unexpected route

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I thought the same. I wonder why.

        Maybe using a less direct route makes it harder to detect their true target and have countermeasures deployed in time?

        • kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 days ago

          So stingers and similar heat seeking missiles have very rudimentary tracking systems and operate at short range so they just go straight to the target (with lead generally programmed in). Long range missiles with advance guidance like this go up to thinner atmosphere first because it’s all about kinetically defeating the enemy craft that’s trying to evade. It takes less propellent to go faster in thinner higher atmosphere so missiles will try and get high.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Here’s my armchair guess

          I’m not sure how much of a direct hit vs shrapnel hit to destroy these are… but if it’s flying upwards and misses the shrapnel will have upward momentum while the target has downward momentum, making a miss be a complete miss.

          If they come back down on their final hit trajectory, they can gain a bit more speed on the downward, while also keeping the shrapnel from the explosion heading downwards, making a potential hit more likely.