Daniel Berntsson, founder of Mullvad, gave a personal donation of 5 million SEK (roughly 450,000€) in 2025 to Örebropartiet. This enormous donation accounted for 72% of the party’s revenue in 2025.

How does this affect Mullvad’s legitimacy as a company advocating for a free and open internet, while also funding a political party whose agenda seem to contradict these values? The official party website (in Swedish) can be found via the link below.

https://orebropartiet.se/om-oss/

  • whatiswrongwithyou@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Mullvad allowed port forwarding for many years until it was put into a position because of collusion between Interpol and the big cdns where it had to choose between cooperating with an investigation or retaining that feature.

    The choice to drop an incredibly popular offering in order to avoid having to cooperate with the police is a testament to the trust component of the service.

    When I said that no one is in that niche at the moment, part of that assessment rests on those events.

    But also there are vanishingly few independent privacy focused VPN services that accept cash payment, don’t have accounts (and therefore don’t have the need for records that can be subpoenaed), don’t keep logs, are well respected and trusted, have open source clients, support shadowsocks and WireGuard, run an ad blocking dns and have had to resist the police in multiple high profile events.

    I’m open to learn of them.

    I assume because you made an equivalence between using an internet service and food you would be willing to buy bread from a Nazi? Again, what masters ideology in the necessarily hierarchical market would you accept?

    • Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State"@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I assume because you made an equivalence between using an internet service and food you would be willing to buy bread from a Nazi? Again, what masters ideology in the necessarily hierarchical market would you accept?

      What level of need does a person have to be in for it to be acceptable that they buy bread from a Nazi owned store?

      what are you talking about? you made that equivalence. I said it was a stupid fucking equivalence.

      • whatiswrongwithyou@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        So, a third time: under what circumstances and level of need would you accept a person paying a Nazi for goods or services?

        • Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State"@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          at no point and under no circumstances. the very idea is preposterous. why would you need to pay a nazi? kill them and take the goods you need. what a ridiculous question.

          you’re not clever, so stop trying to be.