Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2日前Style vs efficiency rulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1467
arrow-up1467imageStyle vs efficiency rulelemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2日前message-square41fedilink
minus-squareTerHu@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2日前yeah, but i’ve seen that shatter too
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2日前If it’s good enough for the sides, it should work for the top
minus-squareanomnom@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-21日前The arenas I’ve been to are closed at the top now, but might not have been back when this happened. Battlebot design is like crab evolution they all end up as fast wedges or spinny things with covered wheels and minimal ground clearance. It’s fun when a novel design has success though. Smaller light weight bots are a lot more creative in my experience. (Drills, torches, etc).
yeah, but i’ve seen that shatter too
If it’s good enough for the sides, it should work for the top
The arenas I’ve been to are closed at the top now, but might not have been back when this happened.
Battlebot design is like crab evolution they all end up as fast wedges or spinny things with covered wheels and minimal ground clearance.
It’s fun when a novel design has success though.
Smaller light weight bots are a lot more creative in my experience. (Drills, torches, etc).