• Murse@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    like they claim they did

    Am skeptical.

    They might just sincerely be stupid, but this all carries a strong scent of bullshit.

    My money’s on a calculated PR move, with almost no investment made into it leading up to the action from Valve, culminating with a woe-is-me to stir up some community support.

    • jmill@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Anything is possible, but they announced it very early, made what looks to be a good design, made enough examples to send to a bunch of content creators, and took pre-orders. For the this to be intended to be a PR stunt only, everything would have hinged on Valve sending them a C&D after they did all those things. What if Valve had ignored it? The most simple explanation is usually correct, and never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity, lol.

      • Murse@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        The most simple explanation is usually correct

        In most contexts, yes.

        and never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity, lol.

        The problem with that rule is most malicious people are well aware of it, making the appearance of stupidity a tool to free them from accountability. Look at politics - we (collectively) give Trump the village idiot pass, ogling at someone could be so stupid as to blunder their way into the absolute worst economic, tactical, social, etc outcome possible. He’s not an outlier in that behavior, and corporate reps / CEOs often do the same shit.

        I don’t have the insider knowledge to say with certainty that any one instance is an example or not, but I definitely reject the whole ‘never attribute to malice’ spiel.