People don’t even want you to play a video game in private now.

"Gibbons cut in: “They’re illegal. They are not in any way affiliated with Microsoft. Microsoft, for Minecraft, has gotten a lot of criticism because of those community servers not employing the same safety standards that Microsoft does on their Minecraft servers.”

  • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    171
    ·
    2 days ago

    […] and just to clear this up right away: what she said was nonsense. You can, literally right now, head over to the official Minecraft website and download a .jar file to let you run your own private server.

    I love how confidently stupid and wrong she was here.

    What I fucking hate is this pattern of attacks on open source and self-hosting we’ve been seeing. Anthropic’s CEO saying that open source self-hosted LLMs are “dangerous” for example.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nice LLM you have there. Be a real shame if one that costs 1/10 the price (and another that can run on a consumer rig self hosted) could outperform it.

    • strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not just open source and self-hosting. They’re going after Steam because they actually treat their customers well. Despite still not truly owning your games on their, you basically do. As long as Steam is good, gamers won’t forget that services can be good, and we can’t have that, can we?

          • Tiger_Man_@szmer.info
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            i have all b and a sides, 5 golden berries, and 3 c sides, currently im playing strawberry jam

            • strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              waow thats based

              i have two golden berries, i think. i definitely have the winged one, and maybe another.

              ive yet to play strawberry jam. it seems like it might be harder than getting all the golden berries? im not sure.

              • Tiger_Man_@szmer.info
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                strawberry jam has 5 lobbies, the first is comparable to a bit hardrr a-sides, the second is more like b sides and idk how about the rest i didnt play them yet. anyway its much easier than most of goldens, and for sure easier than getting them all because there is only around 200 players who got all the berries (because of farewell)

        • strawberry_enjoyer42@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          For real. I think it ended up being alright, but they sued Valve because of gambling in Counter Strike‽ Like, have they never heard of Overwatch‽

          Meanwhile, “Epic” Games profits off of kids who sneak their parents’ credit cards for whatever nonsense is going on in Fortnite, and Roblox is full of predators!

    • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes. This is a classic case of a large company buying an open source product that was specifically designed to get children to be creative and build their own worlds and then deciding that such usage is illegal unless you pay loads of money.

      A perfect snapshot of enshitification.

    • StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Open source LLMs are very dangerous for their bottom line, they have all the same problems as non open source LLMs and the shareholders don’t even make money off of them!

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh but they are VERY dangerous. Dangerous for the 1%’s wealth. What will they do if they have to downsize their billion dollar yachts???

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        But the thing is? They’re not. Billionaires would still be billionaires without attacking open source and self hosting.

        The problem is that billionaires are hungry ghosts. It’s not enough to be fabulously wealthy, they just want more. Forever.