Starlink burns multiple retired satellites daily from its over 10,000-strong constellation

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s no way burning satellites are putting enough energy into the atmosphere to heat it up. They cause other problems like ozone degradation and serious aerosol pollution.

    Rockets on the other hand put a lot of greenhouse gasses high up in the atmosphere, including incredibly potent greenhouse gasses like water vapor. These launches account for a meaningful percentage of all emissions.

      • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’re not crashing the entire rocket, just a tiny bit of it. Also, generating direct energy has never been a climate change issue, it’s the byproducts of that generating that are fucking us up.

          • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            As I said, only the energy of the satellite, not the entire rocket, which is a miniscule fraction of the energy the launch used.

            Also pointing out that it really doesn’t matter, in terms of energy, potential or otherwise. It’s only the physical byproducts that can have any major impact.