• Saapas@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 days ago

    I meant more how they’re now where there’s billionaires there running huge private companies etc

    • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      Yeah, but unlike the US, those billionaires do not control the government. The government is controlled by the CCP.

      It’s the dictatorship of the (people who say they represent) the proletariat. Not the dictatorship of the people who buy the most politicians.

      Yaaayyyy…

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        19 days ago

        To clarify, the PRC is a dictatorship of the proletariat. The CPC is the organization of the proletariat, not its own distinct class.

        • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Indeed! I am hopeful that they do actually represent the proletariat, and there is some great evidence for that. I just do not know enough about the internal politics. They certainly do not represent the capitalists.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 days ago

            The state isn’t outside class struggle, so it helps to understand that if they do not serve capitalists, who else could they serve? The peasantry are nearly gone at this point, leaving the petite bourgeoisie, national bourgeoisie, and the proletariat. We struck out the big bourgeoisie, leaving petite and proletariat, and what helps narrow this down is that the well-being of the whole of society is what is prioritized, which benefits primarily the proletariat, and that their goal is collectivization of production and distribution, which hurts the petite bourgeoisie.

      • Saapas@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        It’s just a very capitalistic seeming thing to have billionaires and huge private corporations. Something familiar to many capitalist countries.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          The commanding heights of China’s economy are publicly owned, and the private corporations that do exist are heavily controlled by “golden shares” the CPC owns. Billionaires exist because private property still exists, and private property exists because markets are useful for socializing production. The social surplus is still oriented towards socialist development. The marketization of small and medium firms is in service of socializing production so that it may develop and be folded into the public sector, not for the sake of capitalist class interests.

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 days ago

            I dunno, I could see private property existing without letting people hoard billions. It’s just very disappointing to see that the prime example of today’s socialism has billionaires running megacorps.

            Work in progress I suppose but understandable how to some that sorta takes the enthusiasm for the ideology out of it for some

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              19 days ago

              You’re getting fixated on an arbitrary level of wealth, rather than relations of production and distribution, and using this as reason to be disappointed. It’s this self-defeating obsession with “purity” that is holding the western left back, and it has roots in cultural Christianity. For many western leftists, it would be better for China to be poor but more dogmatic and anti-Marxist as they were under the Gang of Four than to course-correct and uplift the working classes.

              • Saapas@piefed.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                I’m fixating people being allowed to hoard billions off the labour of others. I don’t think it’s a very high horse to be on lol

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  19 days ago

                  What level of wealth is too much to allow, and how did you come to that conclusion? Why does this take priority over the scientific basis of socializing production and leveraging markets to accelerate this process?

                  • Saapas@piefed.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    19 days ago

                    I mean we cap it at billion. I’d be fine with capping it at much lower too but not allowing someone to hoard billions off the work of other people is at least achievable goal.

                    It’s bad because there’s no wealth like that without exploitation. And in a billion, there’s shitload of exploitation. More of the profits should go to the workers and not feeding some megawealthy elite.

                    But that’s just my take.