• Marija_@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Every time something like this comes out I’m reminded how much telemetry exists that most users never think about.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Early iPhones all had unique UDIDs that were SDK accessible. It wasn’t long before it was used to connect location data to devices and devices with specific users. Apple’s solution was to yank it away from developers and go with an identifier the users could rescind and reset (the ADID). It still let apps track people, but there was always the risk users would reset it and break the chain of data gathering.

    The real solution is to limit access to the information as-needed. Like for maintenance, or warranty repairs. Everybody else can go pound sand. In the desktop/laptop world, a lot of hardware vendors just blithely let anyone access unique hardware IDs, which leads to the same privacy outcome.

  • refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Linux distros have the same kind of device ID mechanism (/etc/machine-id or /var/lib/dbus/machine-id)… the only difference is how applications use it.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Y’all are probably tired of hearing it, but Linux has come a long way, especially for gaming; spin up a VM and try a few distros out.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve used Linux desktop for over 25 years now

      It was mostly ready for all that time. I installed KDE Linux on my mother in law’s computer for basic browsing and games like solitaire 15 years ago. She was in her late 60s and loved using it for almost a decade.

      Linux today is not “ready”, it’s the only serious choice for an operating system for everyone

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep, I installed Aurora on an aging parent’s laptop, because I was worried they’d be the target of some well-crafted malware campaign (hence why I went atomic). Plus the parent doesn’t have good privacy practice, and I know Microsoft was datamining everything they were doing.

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Start with Debian to be stable for a learning experience, then to Fedora to play around, finally Arch when the neck beard grows in.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    24 hours ago

    That’s why all my devices running that piece of shit stay at work. Far away from my network.

  • unskilled5117@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why is there never any more detail how the GDID is then used to collect information?

    The complaint says Microsoft had records showing that on May 12, 2025, at 19:21 UTC, the GDID associated with Stokes’ computer “accessed, among other ngrok pages, ‘https://dashboard[.]ngrok.com/signup,’ the ngrok page to set up an ngrok account.”

    How do the records show a GDID in connection to the website?

  • FiniteBanjo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    TBF nVidia and Intel components supposedly had the same sort of capability for many years now: unique device ids.

    But yeh, fuck windowsm