kivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 21 days agoNO SAFE PPE EXISTS rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1164
arrow-up1164imageNO SAFE PPE EXISTS rulelemmy.blahaj.zonekivihiili@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 21 days agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-squareArcanepotato@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·20 days ago140 if you’re fancy https://macronsafety.com/product/industrial/arc-flash-ppe/oberon-arc140b-flash-coverall-suit/
minus-square0x0@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·20 days ago The suit is not intended for use as a bulletproof vest. This is so American
minus-squareArcanepotato@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·20 days ago The window and suit tested to a V50 of 712 ft/sec with a ballistic threat using a .22″ fragment, and 789 ft/sec with a .308″ fragment. It is an understandable clarification to include.
minus-squaresetVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 days agoIs it for resistance to chunks of metal flying off in the case of an explosion?
minus-squarelemming741@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 days agoWhat will they think of next
minus-squareArcanepotato@crazypeople.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 days agoPaying for remote racking? 😅
140 if you’re fancy
https://macronsafety.com/product/industrial/arc-flash-ppe/oberon-arc140b-flash-coverall-suit/
This is so American
It is an understandable clarification to include.
Is it for resistance to chunks of metal flying off in the case of an explosion?
What will they think of next
Paying for remote racking?
😅