Those too, of course. But it’s parents that both think that infant genitile mutilation sounds plausible. Especially when it’s only done by cults…and US-Americans. How can end up at such a decision for their oh-so-loved newborn?
I remember a vet telling a friend that “uteroectomy drastically lowers the chance for cancer in the uterus” in their dog. Because it’s expensive. Sounds like “teenager pregnancy drastically falls after the age of 20” :-)
Those too, of course. But it’s parents that both think that infant genitile mutilation sounds plausible. Especially when it’s only done by cults…and US-Americans. How can end up at such a decision for their oh-so-loved newborn?
I remember a vet telling a friend that “uteroectomy drastically lowers the chance for cancer in the uterus” in their dog. Because it’s expensive. Sounds like “teenager pregnancy drastically falls after the age of 20” :-)