If 62 Dam’s breaking aren’t a direct consequence of sino and Soviet engineers installing dams to generate hydroelectric power because irresponsible engineers didn’t do the proper math to make functional safe dams and accidentally got 130k to 260k Chinese drowned…
Then how is it a valid argument that nuclear power isn’t safe due to the same mistakes by the engineers who failed to properly safeguard fukishima or Chernobyl or three mile island and accidently killed about 4000 Japanese, Ukrainans and Americans. .
That 4.000 death number is only from liquidators alone aka frontline workers with the most radiation exposure. It doesn’t take into account the excess death rate from people dying of cancer in the long run due to environmental radiation from the disaster where deaths could go into the tens of thousands. Like your numbers are absolute bullshit.
Glad you were able to support your position with a down vote and no citations, what an engaging conversation. Clearly you have the superior moral high ground, and a 12 inch penis /s.
Have you read the paper you are presenting. It has no sourced facts. The only thing it says is based on studies from xyz but it does not list them or cite them. It also states that both the WHO and IAEA are part of a massive transnational conspiracy… Id call this ticktok slop if it was in video form instead of paragraph.
Dams braking arent a direct consequence of renewables, but a flaw of the engineering. Also your argument bears no merit against wind and solar.
Your comment is deeply dishonest and bad faith.
Whoosh.
If 62 Dam’s breaking aren’t a direct consequence of sino and Soviet engineers installing dams to generate hydroelectric power because irresponsible engineers didn’t do the proper math to make functional safe dams and accidentally got 130k to 260k Chinese drowned…
Then how is it a valid argument that nuclear power isn’t safe due to the same mistakes by the engineers who failed to properly safeguard fukishima or Chernobyl or three mile island and accidently killed about 4000 Japanese, Ukrainans and Americans. .
That 4.000 death number is only from liquidators alone aka frontline workers with the most radiation exposure. It doesn’t take into account the excess death rate from people dying of cancer in the long run due to environmental radiation from the disaster where deaths could go into the tens of thousands. Like your numbers are absolute bullshit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_due_to_the_Chernobyl_disaster
provide a source for your claimed excess deaths https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2889503/
holy shit. I did. If you are going to be arguing in bad faith then it’s pointless
Then hopefully you dont ignore this one too https://www.ippnw.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/IPPNW-Germany-Health-Effects-of-Chernobyl-20-years-after-the-reactor-catastrophe.pdf
Here they say “50k to 100k long term deaths”
Glad you were able to support your position with a down vote and no citations, what an engaging conversation. Clearly you have the superior moral high ground, and a 12 inch penis /s.
Have you read the paper you are presenting. It has no sourced facts. The only thing it says is based on studies from xyz but it does not list them or cite them. It also states that both the WHO and IAEA are part of a massive transnational conspiracy… Id call this ticktok slop if it was in video form instead of paragraph.