• Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    The people who say they’re the most concerned for children are still in favor of Epstein boy and think Ms Rachel is some kind of extremist for wanting children to live

    They’re hypocrites and it’s impossible to have a serious conversation with them because they’ll pretend to have principles they don’t (much like libs unsurprisingly)

    • The people who say they’re the most concerned for children are still in favor of Epstein boy and think Ms Rachel is some kind of extremist for wanting children to live

      They care about white children, and only if they can use them to brutakize brown people.

      • InexplicableLunchFiend [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        More like they are obsessed with pedophilia as a concept due to some underlying repressed pedophilia. It’s psycho-sexual and has nothing to do with the actual victims or wanting to reduce pedophilia. It’s more of a tantalizing obsession like true crime people’s obsession with serial killers. They will tell you it’s because they “want to protect themselves” by learning about serial killers, but that’s obvious bullshit because the best way to do that wouldn’t be through infotainment and spectacle. They are attracted to the violence and want to stare at it, that’s basically it.