cm0002@midwest.social to Linux@programming.dev · 23 hours agoVoid Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy disputewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up120cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mlprogramming@programming.dev
arrow-up120external-linkVoid Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy disputewww.phoronix.comcm0002@midwest.social to Linux@programming.dev · 23 hours agomessage-square19fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mlprogramming@programming.dev
minus-squareterabyterex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 hours agook, we are arguing english language. so yes but i was addressing the commenters implied morality on use. which is not allowed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition
minus-squaresem@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 hours agoI did not take that implication from their post. I don’t think that we are arguing semantics. They are saying that licensing code as FOSS is a moral stance, and so is refusing to use llm code generation.
ok, we are arguing english language. so yes but i was addressing the commenters implied morality on use. which is not allowed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Free_Software_Definition
I did not take that implication from their post. I don’t think that we are arguing semantics. They are saying that licensing code as FOSS is a moral stance, and so is refusing to use llm code generation.