return2ozma@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 3年前Bosses and workers still can’t agree on whether the commute is part of the work day, and it’s creating a $578 billion productivity problemfortune.comexternal-linkmessage-square323fedilinkarrow-up11.01K
arrow-up11.01Kexternal-linkBosses and workers still can’t agree on whether the commute is part of the work day, and it’s creating a $578 billion productivity problemfortune.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 3年前message-square323fedilink
minus-squareseverien@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3年前I would just move temporarily, and after probation period move far away. Surely they can’t fire me because my living situation changed and had to move…
minus-squarerandomname01@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3年前In this hypothetical scenario this gets implemented it would certainly be standard to have a clause to protect employers against exactly that.
minus-squareseverien@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-23年前Seems kinda shitty that you basically can’t move without employer’s approval. Also poorer people living farther away would get discriminated.
minus-squareLazz45@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3年前They very much can, will, and do for much less. Welcome to an “at-will” employer. The only thing that’s illegal is discrimination
minus-squarejarfil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3年前What about “living distance discrimination”… /s
I would just move temporarily, and after probation period move far away. Surely they can’t fire me because my living situation changed and had to move…
In this hypothetical scenario this gets implemented it would certainly be standard to have a clause to protect employers against exactly that.
Seems kinda shitty that you basically can’t move without employer’s approval.
Also poorer people living farther away would get discriminated.
They very much can, will, and do for much less. Welcome to an “at-will” employer. The only thing that’s illegal is discrimination
What about “living distance discrimination”… /s