This time next year, a series of massive dams that block off the Klamath River will no longer exist. The soil and rocks originally dug and transported from a nearby mountain in the 1950s will be returned to their home and the river will run freely again.

The Iron Gate Dam, which opened in 1964 as the last of four dams that, at nearly 200 feet tall each, regulated the flow of the river and time releases for the local water supply in Northern California, is now part of the world’s largest dam removal and river restoration project. Iron Gate is scheduled to be the final stop for decommissioning crews.

Mark Bransom, the CEO of the Klamath River Renewal Corporation, said the river will be able to flow freely once the dam’s infrastructure is removed. He also said they have plans to help nature take back the area.

“As soon as the reservoir is drained, we’ll get out on the footprint there and begin some initial restoration activity,” Bransom said. “We want to stabilize the remaining sediments using native vegetation.”

In the age of extreme heat, record-setting drought and catastrophic flooding linked to climate change, there’s been a national push to “rewild,” a movement rooted in restoring nature to the state it was before human intervention, hoping this helps mitigate the effects of climate change.

A big part of that effort is centered around dams, many of which were originally constructed when infrastructural development took priority over environmental protection.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Native Americans conducted controlled burns in the area for centuries. Maybe it’s time to let the real stewards of this land have some say in how it’s managed in crisis.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article says they’re returning it to nature. That is the real steward of the land

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ideally, yes. Practically, nature needs a lot of space to be able to act freely. Protecting only asking a River might not give nature enough margin of maneuver, so we might need to still take some actions.

        • DrPop
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is just one group, there are groups all over trying to restore nature. One of the saddest I heard was about a wildfire (strengthened by climate change) utterly destroyed a very significant percentage of Joshua Trees. They’ve been trying to restore them but only like 1% of the buds they planted yield something. Don’t discount any effort to improve.

  • Ejh3k@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes! Let’s remove more green energy generators! That’ll fix the problem!

    My only regret is that I will not be alive to witness the ultimate collapse of humanity. We are the fucking worst.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The footprint of an 18mw solar farm isn’t that large, likely not that much larger area wise then the dam facility, grounds and critical infrastructure exclusion zone.