A video explaining modern monetary theory and how with a little Marxism it can benefit everyone.

  • dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Advanced "both side"ing going on here. What does it even mean to call an end to conflict? Russia is welcome to go back home and lick its wound, why is the onus on Ukraine to end conflict?

    And end US involvement? So Russia can overrun an independent country?

    • gataloca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That you have to ask Second Thought. This is what he has said about the conflict:

      1. This war doesn’t benefit the average people of Ukraine or Russia. They’re suffering needlessly for the sake of geopolitical jockeying.
      2. Sanctions on Russia will only hurt the everyday citizen, not the oligarchs or the powerful. Sanctions are a brutal, inhumane tool and we should oppose them.
      3. Anti-war is the only principled position. Escalating into a hot war with another nuclear power is a death sentence.
      4. This conflict should be resolved diplomatically. That must include an end to hostilities, as well as a new agreement that prevents NATO expansion towards “unfriendly” states. NATO is a relic of the Cold War, and it doesn’t do anyone any good. A bomb is a bomb, no matter what language you use to make it seem justified.

      You should read the thread if you’re interested.