• bobman@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s fine, but it seems disingenuous to use the general term ‘health care’ when you could be more specific with what that health care actually is.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it’s disingenuous at all. It’s treatment for a woman’s health. Calling out people for disapproving of health care is half the point.

      Abortion is health care.

      • tym@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Killing a 6 month premie isn’t abortion though. That fetus’ bodily autonomy was violated.

        Agreed that abortion is Healthcare. There’s also a tipping point where it’s no longer a cluster of cells, right?

        • Omega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          First off, when you say “isn’t abortion” it kinda sounds like you’re talking about mythical post-birth murder, which doesn’t happen and would be illegal. Not sure if you’re talking about that or not, but I thought I’d preface.

          Aside from that, when it’s “viable” it’s usually just induced labor. If it’s not induced, there’s a reason why they have to take more extreme measures.

          Aside from that, if you give an inch they take a mile. I would rather doctors and their patient be able to do what’s best for the patient’s health than to let the government interfere.

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, you literally said to call it by a general term to get people to think a certain way about it.

        I feel like we should tell them the specific information and let them make their own decision instead of resorting to sly tricks like this.