And buried in the middle of the article:
“He and his colleagues believe that the company’s move was the result of workers’ decision to unionize.”
And buried in the middle of the article:
“He and his colleagues believe that the company’s move was the result of workers’ decision to unionize.”
This argument never made sense to me. Why would greedy companies voluntarily pay for something they don’t need just to support some “greater good” of keeping the economy afloat? It means reduced profits yet the “contribution” of each individual company is just drop in the bucket.
It would make sense if the executives making the order to return to the office also have commercial real estate portfolios.
deleted by creator