• worldwidewave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nancy’s running for re-election as well. These old fogies just won’t step down.

    Major props to Mitt for enjoying the later years of his life.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s American brain rot. We devote our lives to our jobs to the exclusion of everything else; family, friends, hobbies, personal projects, etc. If other jobs were as easy and fulfilling as being a Senator no one would retire.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. They’re just selfish boomers who won’t let other generations have a seat at the table. Judy like housing.

          • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think young conservatives are more likely to believe in climate change. Fox brought it up during the first debate. They may be nuts, but they are more realistic than many of those who have no skin in the game.

    • LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m more willing to forgive members of the house running despite their old age than I am senators.

      Representatives only serve two years, so they’re making a shorter commitment. It’s substantially easier for someone to think they can keep doing something for another two years than it is for them to think they can do it for another six years. Especially on health matters. But also, individual representatives are simply just less important. In our current political environment, an individual senator leaving office is going to be a huge disruption for any balance of power that’s less than 54-46, with another critical point reached at the 60-40 balance. In the house it won’t matter for any caucus that’s ahead by ~5+ seats. Even in today’s razor close house, it was elected as 222-213 seats — a nine seat gap.

      There’s a decent number of older representatives out there. I wouldn’t have minded Lee sticking around there for a bit longer. The only real issue with older representatives is that by staying in office they block the pipeline for new blood and building a bench for future offices. Running for senate in her late 70s is ridiculous though, especially for a first term.

      For Pelosi specifically, I’d put it at 50-50 odds that she retires shortly after the 2024 election. If it wasn’t for her personal feud with Hoyer I’d put it at near-certain. When she decides to retire, I expect she’ll stick around for one last campaign solely because it will improve her ability to fundraise for the DCCC. She’s a team player through and through.

      • Nahvi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I agree in the lesser of two evils kind of way, meaning its better than they are in the House rather than Senate or President, I still think it is pretty shameful. If they just can’t let go of politics it is time to go back home to city and state legislative bodies.

        Still, it is wonderful to read an actually well-stated view point in this post. Seems that most of the thread has devolved to name calling and verbal diarrhea.

        Have an upvote for some quality content!