hypertown@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 3 年前It's fine until you run out of disk spacelemmy.worldimagemessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up11.03K
arrow-up11.03KimageIt's fine until you run out of disk spacelemmy.worldhypertown@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 3 年前message-square132fedilink
minus-squareseaQueue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up28·3 年前Don’t do boy zram dirty, it has a ton of utility when you have ample spare compute and limited RAM.
minus-squarejtfletchbot@lemmy.ko4abp.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·3 年前Doesn’t it compress the contents that it’s storing to help kind of get the best of both worlds? You get faster storage because it’s in ram still, but with it being compressed there’s also “more” available? I could be completely mistaken though
minus-squareEw0@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·3 年前You are correct, although zram uses more cpu power since it compresses things. It’s not really an issue if you’re not using a potato :=)
minus-squareStill@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·3 年前even if you are using a potato it probably doesn’t have much ram so slightly slowing it to make things run smoother is a very popular choice
Unironically that’s how zram works
Don’t do boy zram dirty, it has a ton of utility when you have ample spare compute and limited RAM.
Is that not how it works though? Lol
Doesn’t it compress the contents that it’s storing to help kind of get the best of both worlds?
You get faster storage because it’s in ram still, but with it being compressed there’s also “more” available?
I could be completely mistaken though
You are correct, although zram uses more cpu power since it compresses things. It’s not really an issue if you’re not using a potato :=)
even if you are using a potato it probably doesn’t have much ram so slightly slowing it to make things run smoother is a very popular choice
Today I learned!