• Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Airplanes, trains, boats, gov employees, public service workers, private corp employees (based on gov advice - mostly office workers and sports players), all forms of healthcare workers, schools, immigrants, and military to name a few.

      But most of it has been repealed now thankfully

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wasn’t mandated enough places obviously. Your dipshit view of what freedom is gives you zero right to potentially kill people with your fucked up negligence and I’m really fucking tired of morons arguing this dumbfuckery

        • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why do you think all of those places repealed their mandates?

          Was it because not having the vaccine killed people?

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            42
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who “repealed” anything? Laws are repealed. This was never law. Some organizations stopped requiring it because most people aren’t this type of moron and just got the fucking vaccine, and people like you made it too difficult to continue to be required. So yeah, you sort of got your moronic wish. People of course died for it but that’s their problem right?

            • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              If the government mandates something, it has the same weight as a law.

              Those orgs that don’t require it anymore, didn’t drop it because “most people aren’t this type of moron and just got the fucking vaccine”

              It was because we had more data, and you have to weigh the risks.

              It’s still hard to say what the long term effects of either vaxxed or un-vaxxed will be

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                35
                ·
                1 year ago

                If the government mandates something, it has the same weight as a law.

                No it doesn’t. I don’t think this happened at all except with govt as an employer. You morons could just get a new job.

                it’s hard to say

                It’s actually very easy to say. The vaccine complication rate is near zero and not a single harebrained theory you idiots had has panned out. Try again

                • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Lol, you need time to know long term effects, there still hasn’t been enough of that yet.

                  And yes, a mandate has as much weight as a law, it just depends who issued it. The only really difference in mandate vs law is how it’s initiated, but here, they hold the same weight.

                  I won’t be deleting lemmy :)

                  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    24
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You ignore that not a single person was mandated to get a vaccine in a scenario where they had no choice.

                    Also you idiot, we know the long term effects of death but that didn’t stop you from pretending a hypothetical issue born of a bullshit theory should take precedence.

                    Thanks for the block request btw

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Lol, you need time to know long term effects, there still hasn’t been enough of that yet.

                    How long after a pandemic starts should a vaccine be released? Give me a number please.

                • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, I’ve heard of long covid. But it might as well be named “mid term COVID” as it applies typically applies to anyone who continues to see symptoms past the 3-8 month mark (this varies from study to study).

                  The vaccine doesn’t prevent this either though, but does seem reduce the likelihood, slightly.

                  We still don’t know what’s going to happen in the next 5+ years to come (with covid or the vax). These things can take a while to manifest sometimes, which is partly why vaccine testing is usually so extensively long, like 5-10 years (just not in this case for some reason).

                  • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    If you knew anything, you’d know this isn’t the reason why getting vaccine approval takes so long. It takes so long because there’s a mountain of bureaucrats, lawyers, researchers, and money required to get stuff moving along. Vaccines are pretty low the totem pole for companies and the government to give a shit about, since they’re usually about prevention and not treatment. Companies and the government can’t throw everything at a vaccine to approve. The only reason the covid vaccine was streamlined was because, you guessed it, we were and are in a global pandemic. Nothing about the approval of vaccines was abnormal, it still took nearly 2.5 years.

                  • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    The vaccine doesn’t hang out in your body, so there’s no way that there’s going to be effects 5+ years later. Or even 5 months later. I forget the exact amount of time, but it’s out of your body in a very short time…like 24-48 hours.

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because idiots like you spread misinformation to the point people were being assaulted over it AND simply wearing face masks

            Not having the vaccine killed and continues to kill people. Not getting the vaccine is fucking stupid

            • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Having recovered from COVID while following quarantine procedures is just as good as having the vax - if not better. No?

              • Duranie@lemmy.film
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                21
                ·
                1 year ago

                No.

                Having it can lead to long term damage (lungs, heart, etc.) even if you survive and mostly recover.

                Early on they were able to show that people who got the 2 dose initial vaccine showed protection longer than those that were sick with COVID. Again, without the risk of long term organ/system damage.

                • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’d like to say thank you for being civil and having an actual discussion lol.

                  Here’s a study that came out in Feb 2023 looking at vaccinated protection vs natural immunity -

                  Article: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/natural-immunity-protective-covid-vaccine-severe-illness-rcna71027

                  Study: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02465-5/fulltext

                  The article does promote taking the vaccine as the safer route - which is agreeable if you have co-morbidities. But long term effects of either will only be shown over time, we still need more of that

                  • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    But long term effects of either will only be shown over time, we still need more of that

                    Moron’s take right there

                  • Duranie@lemmy.film
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’ll take the time to look at these after work, but I wanted to briefly chime in.

                    Co-morbidities or not, we have been aware since the beginning (well before the vaccines were available) that some people continued to have lingering symptoms and suffered other types of damage due to having contracted the virus. For example - an athletic coworker in her early 40s contracted it August 2020, and to this day continues to have heart problems. I work in hospice, and while the numbers are lower than they were over the last few years, we still regularly get patients entering hospice due to damage from COVID.

                    I have yet to come across a patient who needed hospice services due to a vaccine.

                    If I’m going to take a “risk” on anything, it’ll be the vaccine.

              • sederx@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                NO.

                In fact you might suffer long COVID symptom which vaccinated people that avoided covid don’t have to .

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      My office, for one. But you prolly mean by government. Crossing the border in Canada led to the trucker thing. To be clear, I got my third booster last month. I’m pro-vax.

      • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Whenever someone just straight up lies about vaccines and the responses to vaccines, they always need to bring up how they’re all vaccinated and pro-vaccine.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nothing I said was a lie. I named two examples of vax mandates. My 24 person company in the Bay Area, where we’re dominated by liberalism (whereas I’m a leftist). And the trucker convoys as a result of a mandate to cross the border. The first, you have no way to verify or disprove (although we were so disorganized that actual proof was never sought; it was a stated policy before we came back to the office in summer of 2021. The second, you’d have to have been in a news blackout to miss. I don’t understand your comment.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Work requirements are not mandates. People at the industrial half of the place where I work (I’m in the office) have to wear safety goggles. They aren’t mandated to wear safety goggles. The government isn’t forcing them to wear safety goggles. They just have to do that as a work requirement. No one forced you to get vaccinated just like no one is forcing them to wear goggles. That doesn’t mean choices don’t have consequences.

            • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I qualified my statement as “not gov” and then followed up with a gov example. You’re arguing in bad faith. Anyway, I’m done with this thread. Hope you have a nice day.

    • freeindv@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tons of places, and Biden tried nationally but thankfully the supreme Court shut him down