I want to selfhost a messaging service for my family. It should be secure and have voice calling option, ideally. Thank you.

  • Elkan Nixed@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m on Signal (obviously not self hosted) and even if I really wanted to move to another platform be it self hosted or yet another privacy focussed one, I can’t ask my friends and family to move to another platform again. I already asked them to move away from WhatsApp, can’t do it again…

    • ancoraunamoka@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what I told most of my friend when they asked me to move to signal. Is is going to be a very shitty company managed by a shitty egocentric person and you are going to regret. But you will make people move and they won’t do it again and won’t understand the reasons

  • Dusty@l.dustybeer.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I host my own matrix instance for my wife, a few friends and I. It has worked great for us. They can either use a web app, or an app on their phone.

  • Scott@lem.free.as
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Matrix. With its bridges you can “wire-in” networks like WhatsApp, Slack, Signal, Telegram, Discord, iMessage, SMS, e-mail, … and have a single app that interacts with them all. You can have a single group chat with users from all those networks participating and no one would be any the wiser.

    • z3bra@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      From my experience (with Dendrite, not synapse, so keep that in mind), bridges create “fake” users to replicate your contacts on these platform as matrix users, and they are visible on the whole instance by all their users (but you might not be able to talk to them). Also, in puppeted mode (which is what you want to “replace” your app with matrix), only a single user can use the bridge at a time, so the other users cannot use it.

      • Scott@lem.free.as
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is true but if you’re self-hosting it’s not that much bother to add additional copies of a bridge for other users (granted, it’s not ideal).

        • z3bra@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bridges were not that easy to manage in my case (regarding process management, and ease of config deployment/reproductibility). It was on OpenBSD though, so your mileage may vary. And still, it leaks all of your contact informations to the other users of the server (like their phone number eventually), so definitely not suited for public instances.

            • z3bra@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s from my own experience. I had a self-hosted matrix server running with Dendrite, and the mautrix-whatsapp bridge running. The bridge was running in puppeted mode, so upon synchronizing contacts, the bridge created “fake” users on the matrix server, one for each of my whatsapp contacts. The matrix username of these contacts is (by default) whatsapp_<phone_number>:domain.tld. And these users are visible (at least) by other users on the same server. It was my own instance and I was the sole user so I didn’t really care. But when a friend of mine wanted to try matrix, I created an account for him on the server, and when he joined, he could see all the fake whatsapp/telegram/discord users created by the bridge on the server. And as the default username includes the phone number, he basically had access to my whole phone contact list in real time.

  • johntash@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re already using Nextcloud, it has a chat w/ video chat as well.

    Matrix / Synapse / Element.io is also pretty cool. The UX might not be on par with what some family expects though. I don’t know if voice/video chat is built-in yet or not, but it was at least an option before.

  • philpo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also a vote for Matrix and Synapse. Works great and you can decide if you federate or not.

  • Milouse@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just for a family and friends I’d go for xmpp. Matrix is still an enormous greavy piece of software, hard to self host if you don’t want to pay for a gigantic server just for it. Also the UI is more like gamer/company chat (discord, slack…), what may not be what your family expect, coming from whatsapp, telegram, or plain sms. In the contrary xmpp is very light and nowadays a lot of tutorial exists on how to configure it, even with voice/video. Plus mobile apps like conversation match the habbits of other messengers.

  • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why? Existing platforms, especially the plain cell network, are going to be far more compatible and reliable.

    • Faceman🇦🇺@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because this is SelfHosted and hosting services yourself is cool?

      Some people have very legitimate reasons to want a secure private communication platform, and others are just enthusiastic nerds who do it for fun.

    • hiajen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cellphone network calls / texts aint secure at all. If you want to communicate in a secure way you need to use another seevice/app.

      Many stated matriy as selfhostable service and i totally agree. Signal/Threema are also good options If you dont want to selhost.

    • Scott@lem.free.as
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Matrix. With its bridges you can “wire-in” networks like WhatsApp, Slack, Signal, Telegram, Discord, iMessage, SMS, e-mail, … and have a single app that interacts with them all. You can have a single group chat with users from all those networks participating and no one would be any the wiser.

  • 8565@lemmy.quad442.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    We use Rocketchat and love it. Been thinking about moving to Matrix but, at this point I’ve got my whole family hooked on Rocket

  • t3chskel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    We use Matrix (Synapse) and it works extremely well. I just wish I could get a STUN/TURN server working…

    • ticho@social.fossware.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My family has been using Synapse since before Covid hit, including TURN server (coturn) for audio and video calls. No complaints about the UI so far, except for Element on iPhone reportedly “freezing” for a few moments when sending messages - and that was over a year ago.

      What problems do you have getting TURN to work?

      • t3chskel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I tried setting up coturn with docker but I can’t remember offhand what I had issues with. I am running a reverse proxy (Traefik) with wildcard certs. I should dig into it again. Do you happen to have any pointers or any good guides I could try following?

  • hitagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like Matrix (I mostly use it with my sister) though XMPP might be a good option too if it’s just for family.

  • DAC Protogen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nextcloud looks really great and it has a chat / video chat too, I want to give it a spin in the future, as it also allows you to self-host a lot of things that people usually outsource to Microsoft, Google or Apple.

    • styx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The video calls in nextcloud are a bit…hard to make work flawless, lol. You also need some amount of ram and cpu in the server.

      • DAC Protogen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you always need some amount of ram and cpu in a server… ;D Well, it’s a shame if those video calls aren’t working nicely without some fiddling. I’ll still set up a Nextcloud at some point, for all that other stuff like calendar, contacts, office, chat and file sync. Kinda enjoying the benefits of cloud synced data, but without a corporation hosting my information and selling me to the advertisement hyenas.

          • TrinityTek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I use Nextcloud Talk video calls outside my local LAN and I didn’t do anything special other than install the Talk app.

            • styx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nice. Either you are lucky or I’m unlucky :). I have used it with my previous vps which only had 2 GB ram (%94 always full with services and stuff) and 1 core. The experience was not very…convincing. I have yet to test it with my new server though.

              • TrinityTek@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                My ODroid H3+ running my Nextcloud instance is pretty over-specced, with 32 GB RAM and a 2 TB m.2 SSD, so that might explain the differing results. I’m surprised it runs so poorly on less capable hardware though. I actually have another Nextcloud instance running on a minimally specced VPS. I’ll test Talk on that instance this evening and see if my results are similar to yours.

                • styx@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That will be a good test. It will be greatly appreciated if you post your results here or on a separate thread.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Don’t listen to all the Matrix fanboys here 😅 It’s no fun having to manage the massive server application and the mobile apps pretty much suck.

    I would go for https://snikket.org/ which is a lightweight all in one solution based on XMPP specifically designed for what you want.