• orangeboats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think OP is talking about the existence of the constitution, but rather it’s about how Americans cite it like it’s the Bible.

    For example, instead of saying the plain-and-simple “I have free rights to express my opinion” I have seen people saying “The X amendment guarantees freedom of speech” or something like that instead.

    It’s kinda weird.

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are three foundations an argument takes:

      -Pathos - Emotion, e.g. “I believe in this argument!”

      -Logos - Logic, e.g. “This is the logic behind this argument.”

      -and Ethos - Authority, e.g. “This is the authority that backs this argument.”

      Everyone in American politics has emotion behind their arguments and no one cares for logic. So if you say: “I have free rights to express my opinion,” or really any other argument, an American will counter with: “Who says that? That isn’t a universal given.”

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s about how Americans cite it like it’s the Bible.

      It is.

      Our laws aren’t really organized like European countries. Every single law we have can be traced back to the Constitution. All legal authority for all government derives from it. That is literally how our legal system is designed. We don’t have to use some vague “I have rights” thing, we can go straight to the source.

      No one can argue with the Constitution. If we amend the Constitution to say we must all carry rubber duckies on Tuesdays, then everyone will carry a rubber duckie on Tuesdays. It is the supreme law of the land. If the constitution says something and you don’t like it, you have to convince the population to amend it.