• MudMan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weeell, SNW is only on season 2 and we’ve already had an animated crossover, a musical episode, two characters doing Star Trek mythbusters, a double date sitcom setup with Spock and a renfair episode.

    SNW isn’t a self-parody, but it’s certainly aiming for TOS’ blend of camp and speculative sci-fi more than the “serious tone” of 90s Trek, if that’s how we want to describe it.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where did people get the idea that 90s Trek was serious?

      Do people not remember Lwaxana Troi? Q being Marvel’s Loki?

      • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think this is because TNG had a very serious tone, and very ridiculous plots. Surface level they spent a lot of time adjusting shirts and trying to act prim and respectful with horns and orchestra in the background, then someone turns into a spider.

        I think this causes people to see different things in it.

        • tmyakal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ironically, this is pretty much how McMahan got Lower Decks. He used to write the TNG Season 8 Twitter, where he’d post fake synopses for his imagined episodes. It was almost always a fairly serious A-plot and a hilariously bananas B-plot.

      • MudMan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. I’m using serious here to meet the previous poster halfway and… well, because yeah, if you compare it to TOS I guess it’s more serious than that.

        In any case, TOS and TNG (and especially DS9 and Voyager) are on different tones and SNW is, appropriately, aiming for modern TOS, not modern TNG.