The number of births in China tumbled 10% last year to hit their lowest level on record, a drop that comes despite a slew of government efforts to support parents and amid increasing alarm that the country has become demographically imbalanced.

China had just 9.56 million births in 2022, according to a report published by the National Health Commission. It was the lowest figure since records began in 1949.

The high costs of child care and education, growing unemployment and job insecurity as well as gender discrimination have all helped to deter many young couples from having more than one child or even having children at all.

  • Thanks for the links. Interesting reads.

    Tldr, oxfam:

    Around 50% of these emissions meanwhile can be attributed to the richest 10% of people around the world, who have average carbon footprints 11 times as high as the poorest half of the population.

    Hard to swallow pill: The way of life of the rich countries, including the one of their poor citizens, is the problem. We, the westerners, are the problem, not the billions of China and India.

    But yay electric cars and recycling… Insert “I’m doing my part” meme.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But if there are massively fewer people (say, 1 billion or less), there are ample safe spaces for them to reside without competition for resources.

      Even if they pollute to current standards, the impacts are far reduced because there are far less people to impact.

      Inb4 eugenicists: I’m not suggesting people should be removed, killed, or forced to do anything. This discussion suggests humanity simply decides to have far far less members.

    • Kayel@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This also ignores the growing middle class in China and India. Countries will have to be quality of life competitive or they will experience brain drain to the west.